Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Labossiere's avatar

I think you fail to consider that Kiefer is fundamentally a conservative artist. He was part of the return to painting, or "new" painting which served to conserve the art market which could not monetize conceptual art and performance art (Beuys) or not as easily. He is also a realist and and an expressionist, both highly conventional styles. The preposterous scale of his work now and almost from the beginning makes it exhibitable only in the largest, most prestigious museums and collectible only by the super rich. And as for Mao, the Western vilification of China never admits that a billion people were lifted out of dire poverty, that trade between China and the West is in the billions of dollars per month, and protest there intends what? to install Capitalism.

Expand full comment

No posts